프라하는 정말 ____ 도시입니다.
보기 선택 후 클릭
정답: A. 아름다운
How to solve: The sentence describes Prague as a city. The blank requires an adjective that fits the common perception of Prague. '아름다운' (beautiful) is the most suitable adjective.
Choice analysis (EN):
A — '아름다운' (beautiful) correctly describes Prague, which is known for its beautiful architecture and scenery.
B — '작을' (small) is incorrect as Prague is a major city, not necessarily small.
C — '재미없는' (boring) is incorrect, as Prague is a very popular and engaging tourist destination.
D — '시끄러운' (noisy) is incorrect as it does not fit the typical description of Prague in a positive context.
프라하에는 ____이/가 많이 옵니다.
보기 선택 후 클릭
정답: C. 관광객
How to solve: The sentence states that 'many people come to Prague'. Given Prague's reputation, the most logical group of people who would 'come' (visit) in large numbers are tourists.
Choice analysis (EN):
A — '학생' (students) might visit, but not in the same general context or numbers as tourists.
B — '의사' (doctors) is irrelevant to the context of visiting a city like Prague in general numbers.
C — '관광객' (tourists) is the most appropriate word, as Prague is a famous tourist destination.
D — '요리사' (chefs) is also irrelevant to the general context of people visiting Prague.
프라하 성은 세계적으로 ____ 곳입니다.
보기 선택 후 클릭
정답: C. 유명한
How to solve: The sentence describes Prague Castle as a place 'globally ____'. Prague Castle is a well-known landmark, so an adjective meaning 'famous' is suitable.
Choice analysis (EN):
A — '위험한' (dangerous) is incorrect; Prague Castle is a safe tourist attraction.
B — '더러운' (dirty) is incorrect; it is a well-maintained historical site.
C — '유명한' (famous) correctly describes Prague Castle, which is a globally recognized landmark.
D — '새로운' (new) is incorrect; Prague Castle is an ancient historical site.
저는 작년에 프라하를 ____.
보기 선택 후 클릭
정답: C. 방문했습니다
How to solve: The sentence states 'I last year Prague ____'. The blank requires a verb that describes an action one would do with a city. '방문했습니다' (visited) is the correct verb.
Choice analysis (EN):
A — '먹었습니다' (ate) is incorrect; you don't 'eat' a city.
B — '공부했습니다' (studied) is incorrect; while one might study *about* Prague, directly 'studying Prague' is awkward in this context.
C — '방문했습니다' (visited) is the most natural and correct verb to use when talking about going to a city.
D — '만들었습니다' (made) is incorrect; you don't 'make' a city in this context.
프라하는 긴 ____를 가진 오래된 도시입니다.
보기 선택 후 클릭
정답: B. 역사
How to solve: The sentence describes Prague as an 'old city with a long ____'. Old cities typically have a 'long history'. Therefore, '역사' (history) is the most fitting noun.
Choice analysis (EN):
A — '미래' (future) is incorrect; an old city has a long past, not a long future in this context.
B — '역사' (history) is the correct word, as old cities are characterized by their long histories.
C — '날씨' (weather) is irrelevant to the age of a city.
D — '시간' (time) is too general and doesn't specifically fit the context of an 'old city' as well as 'history'.
답글 남기기